I can't say I've "discovered" HDR (High Dynamic Range) photography at this point. It's been around for a while and I've certainly enjoyed seeing its implementation. That's not the same as becoming a fan, however. Early on, I wasn't because I though most of the photos I saw using this technique were to odd for my tastes. Now that I've tried it, and applied some additional tricks of my own liking, I'm there.
So, what is HDR? Wikipedia has a good description so I'll just summarize here:
- Film or photo sensors can't "see" all the lights and darks in many scenes.
- You have to decide which to favor.
- Your image will probably not look good.
- You can tweak the image in your computer.
- If you're smart and clever, your tweaks will be OK but not always great.
HDR takes this to another level. It makes 2-5 easy.
Here's one of my efforts offered as an example...
This came about as a result of five pictures, from way over exposed to way under, that I shot using a tripod. The HDR software and other special effects software did their magic and I liked the result.
So, now I'm addicted. In the past few weeks, I've done over a dozen similar images and I see no end in sight. Not all images will have the HDR "look". The scene of the rapids in Putnam, CT is about as weird as I'm willing to let HDR go. The next image...
...has a more painterly feel and it's more in line with what I like. But, who knows what I'll do with HDR over time. Maybe weird will become the norm for me.
No comments:
Post a Comment